Deuteronomy 34:1-12
- The passage opens with Moses being granted a chance to see the land that the people of God would soon take possession of. It calls attention to the fact that Moses will not be entering this land himself. The reasons for this are detailed in a passage not covered in this lectionary cycle, but might be worth looking at.
- For some reason, the passage calls attention to the fact that, when Moses died, "his eyes were not weak nor his strength gone." Did God actively kill Moses, just to make sure that Moses wouldn't get to enter the promised land? How should we deal with this passage?
- Last week's Exodus reading made a big deal about how Moses couldn't see God's face and live. This reading specifically says "the LORD knew (Moses) face to face." Is there a contradiction here? What should we understand about these passages?
1 Thessalonians 2:1-8
- Picking up directly from last week's epistle reading, Paul writes of his relationship with the Thessalonians. Does anything about Paul's relationship with these people seem distinctive? What aspects of Paul's relationship with them seem in common with other churches?
- There's a translation issue in the later verses. In the TNIV, Paul seems to refer to himself (and his companions) as "young children" in verse 7, then reverses the metaphor by referring to the Thessalonians as "children" as he moves toward verse 8. Other translations don't seem to contain this reversal. Why would the TNIV translate the passage in this way? What is Paul trying to get at? As you consult other translations, it may also be helpful to check the footnotes, or even the original Greek if you're able.
- In response to the question about what commandment is the greatest, Jesus responds by quoting certain Scripture passages. What is special about these passages? Also, why does Jesus give a second response to a question that seems intended to have a singular answer?
- Jesus asks a question about what people believe about the Messiah. After hearing the response that the Messiah is "the son of David," Jesus quotes a Psalm (Note that the Psalm itself doesn't use quite the same wording. Is this significant?). Was this Psalm considered to have specifically "Messianic" meaning? How was this understood? Why is the usage of the title "Lord" in reference to a "son" considered such a contradiction? Indeed, why is it such a profound thing when Jesus asks this question that "no one dared to ask him any more questions" after that?
No comments:
Post a Comment